From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yezek v. Mitchell

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Dec 12, 2006
C-05-03461 TEH (N.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2006)

Opinion


DAVID YEZEK and SHAWN FRAZIER, Plaintiffs, v. CHP OFFICER M. MITCHELL, et al., Defendants. No. C-05-03461 TEH United States District Court, N.D. California. December 12, 2006

          ORDER

          THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge.

         Hearing on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is currently set for December 18, 2006, at 1:30 p.m.

         The parties should be prepared to address the following cases at oral argument: Bingham v. City of Manhattan Beach , 931 F.3d 939 (9th Cir. 2003); Pierce v. Multnomah County , 76 F.3d 1032, 1038 (9th Cir. 1996); United States v. Chavez Valenzuela, 268 F.3d 719, 722, 728 (9th Cir. 2001) ; United States v. Holt , 264 F.3d 1215, 1230 (10th Cir. 2001); United States v. Childs 277 F.3d 947, 952 (7th Cir. 2002); Valance v. Wisel , 110 F.3d 1269, 1281 (7th Cir. 2001); United States v. Turvin , 442 F.Supp.2d 796 (D. Alaska 2006).

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Yezek v. Mitchell

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Dec 12, 2006
C-05-03461 TEH (N.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2006)
Case details for

Yezek v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:DAVID YEZEK and SHAWN FRAZIER, Plaintiffs, v. CHP OFFICER M. MITCHELL, et…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California

Date published: Dec 12, 2006

Citations

C-05-03461 TEH (N.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2006)