From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yeoman v. Safe Line Def.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 20, 2023
2:22-cv-01742-ART-NJK (D. Nev. Oct. 20, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01742-ART-NJK

10-20-2023

COURTNEY YEOMAN, an individual, Plaintiff, v. SAFE LIFE DEFENSE, LLC, a domestic limited liability company, Defendant.

TRENCHAK LAW Philip J. Trenchak, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Courtney Yeoman HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC Robert L. Rosenthal, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant Safe Life Defense, LLC


TRENCHAK LAW Philip J. Trenchak, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Courtney Yeoman

HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC Robert L. Rosenthal, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant Safe Life Defense, LLC

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

ANNE R TRAUM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and request that the above-captioned case be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Each party is to bear her/his/its own attorneys' fees and costs, except as otherwise agreed.

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this matter be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees, except as otherwise agreed.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Yeoman v. Safe Line Def.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 20, 2023
2:22-cv-01742-ART-NJK (D. Nev. Oct. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Yeoman v. Safe Line Def.

Case Details

Full title:COURTNEY YEOMAN, an individual, Plaintiff, v. SAFE LIFE DEFENSE, LLC, a…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 20, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01742-ART-NJK (D. Nev. Oct. 20, 2023)