Opinion
April, 1928.
Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict in favor of this plaintiff was inadequate and inconsistent with the evidence, and indicates that the elements of damage were not deliberately considered and determined by the jury. ( Sheehan v. Coffey, 201 App. Div. 87; Nocero v. Denitto, 212 id. 363.) Van Kirk, P.J., Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur.