Opinion
No. 10-5285.
Filed On: December 28, 2010.
BEFORE: Ginsburg, Tatel, and Brown, Circuit Judges
ORDER
Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance and the opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam). Appellant has not shown any error in the district court's dismissal of her Title VII, due process, and defamation claims as barred by res judicata, see,e.g., Smalls v. United States, 471 F.3d 186, 192 (D.C. Cir. 2006), nor has she shown that the court abused its discretion in dismissing her remaining claims as conceded under Local Civil Rule 7(b). See,e.g., Fox v. American Airlines, Inc., 389 F.3d 1291, 1294 (D.C. Cir. 2004).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc.See Fed.R.App.P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.