From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yeatman v. Willet

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Feb 25, 2016
Civil Action No. 3:15CV687 (E.D. Va. Feb. 25, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:15CV687

02-25-2016

CHARLES O. YEATMAN, Plaintiff, v. CRYSTAL WILLET, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

By Memorandum Order entered on December 22, 2015, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiff's action. At that time, the Court directed Plaintiff to affirm his intention to pay the full filing fee by signing and returning a consent to collection of fees form. The Court warned Plaintiff that a failure to comply with the above directive within thirty (30) days of the date of entry thereof would result in summary dismissal of the action.

Plaintiff has not complied with the Court's order to return a consent to collection of fees form. As a result, he does not qualify for in forma pauperis status. Furthermore, he has not paid the statutory filing fee for the instant action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Plaintiffs conduct demonstrates a willful failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

John A. Gibney, Jr.

United States District Judge Date: 2/25/16
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Yeatman v. Willet

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Feb 25, 2016
Civil Action No. 3:15CV687 (E.D. Va. Feb. 25, 2016)
Case details for

Yeatman v. Willet

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES O. YEATMAN, Plaintiff, v. CRYSTAL WILLET, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Feb 25, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:15CV687 (E.D. Va. Feb. 25, 2016)