From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yeagley v. Wells Fargo & Company

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Jan 5, 2007
C-05-3403-CRB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2007)

Opinion

          MICHAEL J. STEINER (State Bar No. 112079) MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622) JOSHUA E. WHITEHAIR (State Bar No. 244900) SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation San Francisco, CA Attorneys for Defendants WELLS FARGO & COMPANY and WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, a division of WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

          JAMES HOYER NEWCOMER & SMILJANICH PA Jill Bowman Attorneys for Plaintiff STEPHEN C. YEAGLEY


          NOTICE OF AND STIPULATION REGARDING SETTLEMENT AND CASE SCHEDULING FOR MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; AND ORDER

         Plaintiff has brought this case as a putative nationwide class action alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

         On or about October 5, 2006 the parties began a mediation before retired District Court Judge Fern Smith from JAMS. On or about January 3, 2007, the parties reached an agreement in principle for the Settlement of the nationwide class action filed by Plaintiff against Wells Fargo & Co. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo") for the class alleged in the Amended Class Action Complaint in this action. The parties need additional time to complete the paperwork necessary for the filing of a Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Class Action settlement in accordance with Rule 23. Accordingly, the parties believe that a stay of all pending pretrial deadlines is warranted and anticipate that Plaintiff will be able to file his Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Class Action Settlement by no later than February 28, 2007. This stay of pretrial proceedings and establishment of a schedule to begin the Court's review of the parties settlement would be in the interests of judicial efficiency. The parties, through their respective counsel, therefore stipulate as follows.

         1. All current deadlines, including but not limited to discovery deadlines and motion filing deadlines shall be stayed indefinitely or until further Order of the Court;

         2. The hearing for Wells Fargo's motion for a protective order, currently set for January 5, 2007, and the hearing on Plaintiff's motion for class certification, currently set for February 23, 2007, shall be taken off calendar;

         3. A hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Class Action Settlement shall be set on March 16, 2007 or such other date as set by the Court;

         4. The parties reserve the right to request an earlier date for hearing on the Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Class Action Settlement, so long as Plaintiff's motion is filed no less than 14 days prior to the hearing date set forth in the motion.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Yeagley v. Wells Fargo & Company

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Jan 5, 2007
C-05-3403-CRB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2007)
Case details for

Yeagley v. Wells Fargo & Company

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN C. YEAGLEY, on behalf of himself and those similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California

Date published: Jan 5, 2007

Citations

C-05-3403-CRB (N.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2007)