From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yeager v. Widdal

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Nov 22, 2021
2:21-cv-112 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 22, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-112

11-22-2021

DUANE YEAGER, Plaintiff, v. MITZIE WIDDAL, KENNETH TRIVITT, SERGEANT MCGINNIS, and DEXTER LUNSFORD, Defendants.


Wyrick, Magistrate Judge.

JUDGMENT ORDER

CHARLES E. ATCHLEY, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously with this Order, Plaintiff's pro se complaint for violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff is ASSESSED the filing fee of $400.00, and the custodian of Plaintiff's inmate trust account is DIRECTED to submit payments toward the filing fee in the manner set forth in the Memorandum Opinion. The Clerk is DIRECTED to provide a copy of the Memorandum Opinion and this Order to the Court's financial deputy and the Warden of Plaintiff's current facility.

Because the Court CERTIFIED in the Memorandum Opinion that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Yeager v. Widdal

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Nov 22, 2021
2:21-cv-112 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Yeager v. Widdal

Case Details

Full title:DUANE YEAGER, Plaintiff, v. MITZIE WIDDAL, KENNETH TRIVITT, SERGEANT…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Nov 22, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-112 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 22, 2021)