From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yeager v. Marshall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Apr 4, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-CV-122-TMH (M.D. Ala. Apr. 4, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-CV-122-TMH

04-04-2012

ROBERT T. YEAGER, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF D.T. MARSHALL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #3) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that

1. The Recommendation (Doc. #3) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED;
2. Plaintiff's § 1983 respondeat superior, conflict of interest, grievance, verbal abuse, cruel and unusual punishment, and equal protection claims are DISMISSED with prejudice and prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and/or (ii);
3. Plaintiff's complaint against Defendants Marshall, Palmer, Matthews, Ford, Williams, Scarver, Davis, and Christbourg is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process;
4. Defendants Marshall, Palmer, Matthews, Ford, Williams, Scarver, Davis, and Christbourg are DISMISSED as parties to the complaint; and
5. Plaintiff's retaliation claim against Defendant Gardner is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

Truman M. Hobbs

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Yeager v. Marshall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Apr 4, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-CV-122-TMH (M.D. Ala. Apr. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Yeager v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT T. YEAGER, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF D.T. MARSHALL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 4, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-CV-122-TMH (M.D. Ala. Apr. 4, 2012)