From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zhi Qiang Ye v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Apr 25, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-01742 SECTION P (W.D. La. Apr. 25, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-01742 SECTION P

04-25-2017

ZHI QIANG YE v. PHILLIP T. MILLER, et al.


CHIEF JUDGE DRELL

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Petitioner Zhi Qiang Ye ("Ye") applied to this Court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001). A show cause hearing will be held in this matter. Since it has been shown that Ye is not capable of understanding or participating in a meaningful way in a legal proceeding, counsel must be appointed for him.

Appointment of counsel is available for habeas corpus petitioners under 18 U.S.C. §3006A, when necessary in the interest of justice. Habeas Corpus Rule 8(c). There is a right to counsel in a habeas case when the district court determines that an evidentiary hearing is required. Swazo v. Wyoming Dept. of Corrections, 23 F.3d 333-34 (10th Cir. 1994), citing U.S. v. Vasquez, 7 F.3d 81, 84 (5th Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Federal Public Defender is appointed to represent Ye for the purpose of holding an evidentiary hearing in the above-captioned case.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED in chambers at Alexandria, Louisiana on this 25th day of April, 2017.

/s/_________

Joseph H.L. Perez-Montes

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Zhi Qiang Ye v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Apr 25, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-01742 SECTION P (W.D. La. Apr. 25, 2017)
Case details for

Zhi Qiang Ye v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:ZHI QIANG YE v. PHILLIP T. MILLER, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Apr 25, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-01742 SECTION P (W.D. La. Apr. 25, 2017)