From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ybarra v. Neal

United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana
Jan 3, 2023
3:21-CV-418-RLM-MGG (N.D. Ind. Jan. 3, 2023)

Opinion

3:21-CV-418-RLM-MGG

01-03-2023

RANDY RUSSELL YBARRA, Plaintiff, v. RON NEAL and SGT. LEWIS, Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT L. MILLER, JR. JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Randy Russell Ybarra, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a motion asking for a default judgment because the defendants didn't file a sur-reply. ECF 73. Default is appropriate when a defendant “has failed to plead or otherwise defend ....” Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a). These defendants both plead and defended. They were permitted, but not required, to file a sur-reply. Not doing so is not a basis for a default judgment.

For these reasons, the motion (ECF 73) is DENIED.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Ybarra v. Neal

United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana
Jan 3, 2023
3:21-CV-418-RLM-MGG (N.D. Ind. Jan. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Ybarra v. Neal

Case Details

Full title:RANDY RUSSELL YBARRA, Plaintiff, v. RON NEAL and SGT. LEWIS, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana

Date published: Jan 3, 2023

Citations

3:21-CV-418-RLM-MGG (N.D. Ind. Jan. 3, 2023)