From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yazell v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Sep 15, 2009
C-1-06-399 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 15, 2009)

Opinion

C-1-06-399.

September 15, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate (doc. no. 19) denying plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs Under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA") (doc. no. 15) to which there are no objections.

Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge has accurately set forth the controlling principles of law and properly applied them to the particular facts of this case and agrees with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS AND INCORPORATES HEREIN BY REFERENCE the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 19). Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (doc. no. 15) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Yazell v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Sep 15, 2009
C-1-06-399 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 15, 2009)
Case details for

Yazell v. Commissioner of Social Security

Case Details

Full title:MARK YAZELL, Plaintiff v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Sep 15, 2009

Citations

C-1-06-399 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 15, 2009)

Citing Cases

Dotson v. Colvin

Although there is scant authority in the Sixth Circuit, other circuits that have considered this question…