From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yates v. Toasties

United States District Court, N.D. California
Sep 20, 2010
CASE NO. CV-10-1485-WHA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV-10-1485-WHA.

September 20, 2010

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar #074414), THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION , San Rafael, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff CRAIG YATES, an individual.


MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO COMPEL FULL GENERAL ORDER 56 INSPECTION; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON [L.R. 7-11; Gen. Order 56]


Plaintiff, pursuant to Local Rule 7-11 and General Order 56, hereby moves this Court for Administrative Relief, and requests the Court to compel a General Order 56 joint site inspection at Toasties located at 1336 9th Avenue, San Francisco, California.

The case before the Court seeks, in part, relief pursuant to Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). Accordingly, litigation of this case is controlled by the procedures established in General Order No. 56. These procedures impose a stay on all discovery until after the parties' case management conference.

General Order No. 56 provide for a party who wishes to be relieved of any requirement of this order may file a motion for Administrative Relief pursuant Local Rule 7-11.

Plaintiff Craig Yates seeks relief under General Order 56 to compel defendants HON WING FUNG and PIK WAH LEE FUNG, as Trustees of THE FUNG FAMILY TRUST, U.D.T. ("Under Declaration of Trust"), Dated August 24, 1994; and CHARLIE TRUONG, an individual, dba TOASTIES to comply with General Order 56 itself. The access issue in this case primarily involves the lack of access into the restaurant itself due to an approximate six (6) inch height landing and an inaccessible unisex restroom.

The complaint sets these claimed premises violations as architectural barriers that were encountered by plaintiff, knowledge that the restroom was not accessible and hence it would be a futile gesture to attempt to use it.

As set out more fully in the Declaration of Thomas E. Frankovich, defendants' counsel refusal to allow inspection of the unisex restroom at the initial General Order 56 inspection conducted on Monday, August 23, 2010 at Toasties Restaurant located at 1336 9th Avenue, San Francisco, California, is a violation of the General Order 56.

Plaintiff seeks an order to compel a full General Order 56 inspection of the premises including but not limited to the unisex restroom.

Therefore, plaintiff is respectfully requesting that based upon this Motion, and the accompanying Declaration of Thomas E. Frankovich that said motion be granted.

Dated: September 13, 2010

ORDER

This matter comes before the Honorable William H. Alsup on the motion of plaintiff Craig Yates for Administrative Relief and to Compel Defendants HON WING FUNG and PIK WAH LEE FUNG, as Trustees of THE FUNG FAMILY TRUST, U.D.T. ("Under Declaration of Trust"), Dated August 24, 1994; and CHARLIE TRUONG, an individual, dba TOASTIES to complete the General Order No. 56 joint site inspection as required by the court.

IT IS SO ORDERED that this Court, having fully considered the moving papers, and good cause appearing therefore and hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion to conduct a full General Order 56 inspection at Toasties located at 1336 9th Avenue, San Francisco, California. Said inspection shall be completed within (30) days of execution of this Order.


Summaries of

Yates v. Toasties

United States District Court, N.D. California
Sep 20, 2010
CASE NO. CV-10-1485-WHA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2010)
Case details for

Yates v. Toasties

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG YATES, an individual, Plaintiff, v. TOASTIES, HON WING FUNG and PIK…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Sep 20, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. CV-10-1485-WHA (N.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2010)