From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yates v. Sweet Potato Enter., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 13, 2013
CASE NO. C 11-01950 SBA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. C 11-01950 SBA

03-13-2013

CRAIG YATES, an individual; Plaintiff, v. SWEET POTATO ENTERPRISE, INC., a California Corporation dba POPEYES STORE # 2794; and KUAN L. NG and HELEN L. NG, Trustees, of THE KUAN L. NG AND HELEN L. NG REVOCABLE TRUST OF 1993, Defendants.

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414) GEORGE S. KHOURY (State Bar No. 269738) THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH, A Professional Law Corporation Attorneys for Plaintiff CRAIG YATES, an individual Tyler M. Paetkau (SBN 146305) James H. Harnett (SBN 84587) Charles J. Smith (SBN 72700) HARTNETT, SMITH & PAETKAU Attorney for Defendants SWEET POTATO ENTERPRISE, INC., a California Corporation dba POPEYES STORE # 2794; and KUAN L. NG and HELEN L. NG, Trustees, of THE KUAN L. NG AND HELEN L. NG REVOCABLE TRUST OF 1993


THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar No. 074414)
GEORGE S. KHOURY (State Bar No. 269738)
THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,
A Professional Law Corporation
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CRAIG YATES, an individual
Tyler M. Paetkau (SBN 146305)
James H. Harnett (SBN 84587)
Charles J. Smith (SBN 72700)
HARTNETT, SMITH & PAETKAU
Attorney for Defendants
SWEET POTATO ENTERPRISE, INC.,
a California Corporation dba POPEYES STORE # 2794;
and KUAN L. NG and HELEN L. NG, Trustees,
of THE KUAN L. NG AND HELEN L. NG
REVOCABLE TRUST OF 1993

JOINT CERTFICATION OF COUNSELS'

MEET AND CONFER RE: MOTIONS IN

LIMINE AND STIPULATION TO

EXCLUDE MENTION OF, OR

EVIDENCE RELATING TO, CERTAIN

ISSUES AND ORDER THEREON

The parties to the above-captioned action, through their respective counsels, jointly submit this Certification that Counsel for plaintiff and defendants have met and conferred as to each issue raised by the Motions In Limine presented to this Court, pursuant to Judge Armstrong's September 21, 2012 Standing Order, and the February 14, 2013 Order Striking Plaintiff's Motions In Limine.

On February 15, 2013, attorney George S. Khoury, for plaintiff, and attorneys Tyler Paetkau and Olga Savage, for defendants, did meet and confer as to each and every issue raised in the respective motions in limine. Counsel discussed each issue in good faith, and attempted to resolve each issue informally.

In discussing the issues, counsel were able to agree to, and hereby stipulate that:

1.) Defendants will not mention, or seek to introduce into evidence, information that relates to plaintiff CRAIG YATES receipt of disability benefits and social security.

2.) Plaintiff will not mention, or seek to introduce into evidence, information relating to how plaintiff CRAIG YATES became disabled.

Respectfully submitted,

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH,

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

By: _______________

Thomas E. Frankovich

George S. Khoury

Attorneys for Plaintiff CRAIG YATES

HARTNETT, SMITH & PAETKAU

By: _______________

Tyler Paetkau

Olga Savage

Attorneys for Defendants SWEET POTATO

ENTERPRISE, INC., a California Corporation dba

POPEYES STORE # 2794; and KUAN L. NG and

HELEN L. NG, Trustees, of THE KUAN L. NG

AND HELEN L. NG REVOCABLE TRUST OF

1993

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED that pursuant to the stipulation of the parties: 1.) defendants shall not mention, or seek to introduce into evidence, at trial, information that relates to plaintiff CRAIG YATES receipt of disability benefits and social security; and 2.) plaintiff shall not mention, or seek to introduce into evidence, at trial, information relating to how plaintiff CRAIG YATES became disabled.

_______________

Honorable Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong

United States District Court, Northern District

of California


Summaries of

Yates v. Sweet Potato Enter., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 13, 2013
CASE NO. C 11-01950 SBA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Yates v. Sweet Potato Enter., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG YATES, an individual; Plaintiff, v. SWEET POTATO ENTERPRISE, INC., a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 13, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. C 11-01950 SBA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2013)