From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yates v. Schumacher

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 16, 1977
563 P.2d 771 (Or. Ct. App. 1977)

Summary

In Yates v. Schumacher, 29 Or. App. 449, 563 P.2d 771 (1977), we affirmed, Per Curiam citing Ague, an injunction abating a mobile home as a nuisance under the Clackamas County ordinance.

Summary of this case from Clackamas County v. Dunham

Opinion

No. 90820, CA 6818

Argued May 4, 1977

Affirmed May 16, 1977

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clackamas County.

Winston L. Bradshaw, Judge.

Mark P. O'Donnell, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were John W. Shonkwiler, and O'Donnell, Rhoades Gerber, Portland.

Scott H. Parker, Clackamas County Counsel, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Tanzer and Johnson, Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Affirmed. Clackamas County v. Ague, 27 Or. App. 515, 556 P.2d 1386 (1976), Sup Ct review denied (1977).


Summaries of

Yates v. Schumacher

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 16, 1977
563 P.2d 771 (Or. Ct. App. 1977)

In Yates v. Schumacher, 29 Or. App. 449, 563 P.2d 771 (1977), we affirmed, Per Curiam citing Ague, an injunction abating a mobile home as a nuisance under the Clackamas County ordinance.

Summary of this case from Clackamas County v. Dunham
Case details for

Yates v. Schumacher

Case Details

Full title:YATES et ux, Appellants, v. SCHUMACHER et al, Respondents

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 16, 1977

Citations

563 P.2d 771 (Or. Ct. App. 1977)
563 P.2d 771

Citing Cases

Clackamas County v. Dunham

The facts in that case are different in that there the mobile home was a single unit stored on the property…