From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yates v. McDonald's

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 4, 2011
CASE NO. CV-10-0950-EDL (TEH) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV-10-0950-EDL (TEH)

10-04-2011

CRAIG YATES, an individual, Plaintiff, v. MCDONALD'S #1462; MCDONALD'S of HAWAII DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Hawaii Limited Partnership, Defendants.

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar #074414) THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION CRAIG YATES, an individual BURNHAM BROWN Brendan Brownfield Attorneys for MCDONALD'S #1462; MCDONALD'S of HAWAII DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Hawaii Limited Partnership


THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH (State Bar #074414)

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

CRAIG YATES, an individual

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to dismissal of this action in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). Outside of the terms of the Settlement Agreement and General Release ("Agreement") herein, each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. The parties further consent to and request that the Court retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the Agreement. See Kokonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375 (1994) (empowering the district courts to retain jurisdiction over enforcement of settlement agreements).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section 41(a)(1).

This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall constitute one original document.

THOMAS E. FRANKOVICH

A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION

Thomas E. Frankovich

Attorney for CRAIG YATES, an individual

BURNHAM BROWN

Brendan Brownfield

Attorneys for MCDONALD'S #1462;

MCDONALD'S of HAWAII DEVELOPMENT

COMPANY, a Hawaii Limited Partnership

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the parties' Settlement Agreement and General Release should such enforcement be necessary.

Judge Thelton E. Henderson


Summaries of

Yates v. McDonald's

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 4, 2011
CASE NO. CV-10-0950-EDL (TEH) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Yates v. McDonald's

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG YATES, an individual, Plaintiff, v. MCDONALD'S #1462; MCDONALD'S of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 4, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. CV-10-0950-EDL (TEH) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)