From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yates v. Mangosteen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 8, 2013
No. C10-3747 JSC (N.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)

Opinion

No. C10-3747 JSC

05-08-2013

Craig Yates, Plaintiff(s), v. Mangosteen, et al., Defendant(s).


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________

Jacqueline Scott Corley

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Yates v. Mangosteen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 8, 2013
No. C10-3747 JSC (N.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Yates v. Mangosteen

Case Details

Full title:Craig Yates, Plaintiff(s), v. Mangosteen, et al., Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 8, 2013

Citations

No. C10-3747 JSC (N.D. Cal. May. 8, 2013)