From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yates v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jan 12, 2009
Case No. CIV-08-320-F (W.D. Okla. Jan. 12, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-08-320-F.

January 12, 2009


ORDER


On December 16, 2008, United States Magistrate Judge Bana Roberts issued a Report and Recommendation, wherein she recommended that defendant's final decision denying plaintiff's applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income payments under the Social Security Act be affirmed.

Presently before the court is plaintiff's objections to the Report and Recommendation. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court has conducted a de novo review of the matter. Having done so, the court concurs with the analysis and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Roberts. The court finds plaintiff's objection to be without merit. Therefore, the court accepts, adopts and affirms the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Bana Roberts on December 16, 2008 (doc. no. 13) is ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. The final decision of defendant, Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, denying plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income payments under the Social Security Act, is AFFIRMED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Yates v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jan 12, 2009
Case No. CIV-08-320-F (W.D. Okla. Jan. 12, 2009)
Case details for

Yates v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JEFFERY J. YATES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 12, 2009

Citations

Case No. CIV-08-320-F (W.D. Okla. Jan. 12, 2009)

Citing Cases

Ruybal v. Astrue

He considered that although plaintiff claimed her disability began in 1985 after an accident, hospital…