From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yaohua v. Aramark

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 2, 2007
253 F. App'x 84 (2d Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-1733-cv.

November 2, 2007.

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Yaohua Deng, Stony Brook, NY, pro se.

Steven M. Stimell, Bryan Cave LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellee, Aramark Educational Group, Inc.

Andrew P. Marks, Littler Mendelson, P.C., New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellees, Chartwells Company and Dennis Lestrange.

PRESENT: Hon. SONIA SOTOMAYOR, Hon. B.D. PARKER and Hon. PETER W. HALL, Circuit Judges.


SUMMARY ORDER

Appellant Yaohua Deng, pro se, appeals from a March 24, 2006 judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Hurley, J.), 2006 WL 752826, dismissing appellant's complaint as barred by the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel. We presume the parties' familiarity with the facts and procedural history of the case, and the arguments on appeal.

Having reviewed the record de novo, we affirm the judgment dismissing the complaint for the reasons stated by the district court. Further, contrary to appellant's contentions, the district court previously denied his claims regarding unlawful discharge and the seniority system on the merits and, thus, those claims were barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel. Therefore, we hold that appellant's claims were properly dismissed.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Yaohua v. Aramark

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 2, 2007
253 F. App'x 84 (2d Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Yaohua v. Aramark

Case Details

Full title:YAOHUA DENG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARAMARK EDUCATIONAL GROUP, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Nov 2, 2007

Citations

253 F. App'x 84 (2d Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Segreto v. Town of Islip

Maharaj v. Bankamerica Corp., 128 F.3d 94, 97 (2d Cir. 1997) (citation omitted); see also Deng v. Aramark…

Francis v. Nichols

See id. at *10 ("Though [defendant] was neither a party to the state court claims, nor in privity with a…