From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yannacci v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 20, 1987
129 A.D.2d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

April 20, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rader, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On the afternoon of June 28, 1982, the defendant's bus allegedly struck a pothole filled with water. This caused the water to spray onto the plaintiff which caused her to fall to the ground, resulting in her injuries. The defendant contends that as a matter of law the risk of injury was unforeseeable.

It is the risk of injury which must be a foreseeable consequence of the defendant's actions (see, Danielenko v Kinney Rent A Car, 57 N.Y.2d 198), not the manner in which the injury occurs (Derdiarian v Felix Contr. Corp., 51 N.Y.2d 308). In this case varying inferences are possible and thus a question for the trier of fact is presented (see, Ventricelli v Kinney Sys. Rent A Car, 45 N.Y.2d 950). Therefore, summary judgment was properly denied. Thompson, J.P., Weinstein, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Yannacci v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 20, 1987
129 A.D.2d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Yannacci v. New York City Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:ROSE YANNACCI, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 20, 1987

Citations

129 A.D.2d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)