From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yanko v. Wellpath LLC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 20, 2023
2:22-cv-01311-GMN-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 20, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01311-GMN-DJA

01-20-2023

Alexander P. Yanko, Plaintiff, v. Wellpath, LLC, Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

DANIEL J. ALBREGTS, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On October 7, 2022, the Court denied Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis because it was on the wrong form. (ECF No. 3). The Court gave Plaintiff until November 7, 2022 to file a new application or pay the filing fee. (Id.). It explained that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation to the district judge that the action be dismissed. (Id.). Plaintiff has missed his deadline and, to date, has filed nothing further with the Court.

Accordingly, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that this case be DISMISSED.

NOTICE

This report and recommendation is submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to this case under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party who objects to this report and recommendation may file a written objection supported by points and authorities within fourteen days of being served with this report and recommendation. Local Rule IB 3-2(a). Failure to file a timely objection may waive the right to appeal the district court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Yanko v. Wellpath LLC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 20, 2023
2:22-cv-01311-GMN-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Yanko v. Wellpath LLC

Case Details

Full title:Alexander P. Yanko, Plaintiff, v. Wellpath, LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 20, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01311-GMN-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 20, 2023)