From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yanko v. Wellpath LLC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 7, 2022
2:22-cv-01311-GMN-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 7, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01311-GMN-DJA

10-07-2022

Alexander P. Yanko, Plaintiff, v. Wellpath, LLC. Defendant.


ORDER

DANIEL J. ALBREGTS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pro se Plaintiff Alexander P. Yanko submitted initiating documents to the Court which include an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a civil rights complaint. (ECF Nos. 1, 11). However, Plaintiff's application is on the wrong form. Plaintiff has filled out the form for state court, rather than for federal court.

The Court with therefore deny Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice. If Plaintiff chooses to file another in forma pauperis application, then he must file a complete application on this Court's approved form.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is denied without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is kindly directed to send Plaintiff a blank application to proceed in forma pauperis (non-inmate packet) as well as the accompanying instruction packet.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that by November 7, 2022, Plaintiff must either: (1) file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, on the correct form; or (2) pay the full $402 filing fee for a civil action, which includes the $350 filing fee and the $52 administrative fee. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to the District Judge that this action be dismissed.


Summaries of

Yanko v. Wellpath LLC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 7, 2022
2:22-cv-01311-GMN-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Yanko v. Wellpath LLC

Case Details

Full title:Alexander P. Yanko, Plaintiff, v. Wellpath, LLC. Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 7, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01311-GMN-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 7, 2022)