From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yang v. Woodford

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 6, 2007
No. CIV S-05-0943 DFL KJM P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-0943 DFL KJM P.

April 6, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee.

Since petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be directed to file a response to petitioner's application.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent is directed to file a response to petitioner's application within sixty days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. An answer shall be accompanied by any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application. See Rule 5, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases;

2. Petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within thirty days of service of an answer;

3. If the response to petitioner's application is a motion, petitioner's opposition or statement of non-opposition shall be filed and served within thirty days of service of the motion, and respondents' reply, if any, shall be filed within fifteen days thereafter; and

4. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General.


Summaries of

Yang v. Woodford

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 6, 2007
No. CIV S-05-0943 DFL KJM P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2007)
Case details for

Yang v. Woodford

Case Details

Full title:XIONG NICK YANG Petitioner, v. JEANNE WOODFORD, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 6, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-05-0943 DFL KJM P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 6, 2007)