Opinion
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
Super. Ct. No. RCV092365
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING
RICHLI J.
Appellants’ petition for rehearing is denied. The opinion filed in this matter on March 9, 2009 is modified as follows:
In the last paragraph starting on page 17 and continuing on page 18, the last three sentences, as follows, are deleted:
Whatever document defendants filed on May 15 is not in the record. From its caption, however, it appears to have been a proof of service of the ex parte application, not of the motion. If it was a proof of service of the motion, it was redundant and duplicative.
The deleted sentences are replaced with:
On May 15, defendants filed an additional proof of service, relating to both the ex parte application and the motion. As a proof of service of the motion, it was merely duplicative.
Other than this modification, the opinion remains unchanged. This modification does not effect a change in the judgment.
We concur, HOLLENHORST Acting P.J.,GAUT J.