From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yang v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 21, 2011
No. CIV S-08-2233 FCD DAD (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-2233 FCD DAD (TEMP) P.

January 21, 2011


ORDER


On January 5, 2011, petitioner filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed December 21, 2010. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed December 21, 2010, is affirmed.

DATED: January 20, 2011.


Summaries of

Yang v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 21, 2011
No. CIV S-08-2233 FCD DAD (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Yang v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:TENG YANG, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 21, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-08-2233 FCD DAD (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2011)