From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yanez v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 6, 2007
No. CIV S-07-1012 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1012 FCD KJM P.

June 6, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

The application attacks a conviction issued by the Orange County Superior Court. While both this court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner's application are more readily available in Orange County. Id. at 499 n. 15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).

Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California.


Summaries of

Yanez v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 6, 2007
No. CIV S-07-1012 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2007)
Case details for

Yanez v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:JAKE YANEZ, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 6, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1012 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2007)