From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yancy-El v. Kelly

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 17, 2024
2:24-cv-751 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 17, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-751

09-17-2024

PAMELA P. YANCY-EL Plaintiff, v. CHRIS KELLY, et al., Defendants.


Maureen P. Kelly, Magistrate Judge

MEMORANDUM ORDER

J. Nicholas Ranjan United States District Judge

This is a pro se case asserting civil rights violations. This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly for proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and the Local Rules of Court applicable to Magistrate Judges.

Currently before the Court are two Reports & Recommendations filed by Judge Kelly. The first, filed on June 21, 2024 (ECF 8), recommends that the Court (1) dismiss with prejudice Ms. Yancy-El's claims against Magisterial District Judge Richard D. Olasz, Jr., and (2) dismiss without prejudice her claims against all other parties. The parties were notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), objections to the Report & Recommendation were due within fourteen days, or seventeen days for unregistered ECF users. Ms. Yancy-El subsequently submitted a “supplement” to her complaint (ECF 12), which appears to list out her desired relief. She did not file any objections to the first Report & Recommendation.

The second, filed on June 24, 2024 (ECF 11), recommends that the Court deny Ms. Yancy-El's Petition for Order of Protection (ECF 6), which Judge Kelly construes as a motion for a temporary restraining order. The parties were notified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), objections to the Report & Recommendation were due within fourteen days, or seventeen days for unregistered ECF users. Ms. Yancy-El also did not file any objections to the second Report & Recommendation.

On July 25, 2024, Judge Kelly filed a “corrective entry” for her June 24, 2024, Report & Recommendation because it was missing a page. ECF 13. The Court gave Ms. Yancy-El additional time to object to the second Report & Recommendation based on this filing.

Upon a review of the record of this matter and the two Reports & Recommendations, the Court finds no clear error on the face of the record, and therefore enters the following order:

AND NOW, this 17th day of September, 2024, it is hereby ORDERED that Judge Kelly's Reports & Recommendations, ECF 8 and ECF 13, are ADOPTED as the opinions of the Court.


Summaries of

Yancy-El v. Kelly

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 17, 2024
2:24-cv-751 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Yancy-El v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:PAMELA P. YANCY-EL Plaintiff, v. CHRIS KELLY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 17, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-751 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 17, 2024)

Citing Cases

Davis-EL v. Kelly

See 28 U.S.C. § 1332; Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3); Yancy-El v. Kelly, No. 2:24-CV-751, 2024 WL 3413261, at *1…

Davis-El v. Adams

Accordingly, even assuming the amount of controversy is met, diversity jurisdiction does not apply. See 28…