Opinion
22-cv-09045-JSW
08-28-2023
ESTELLE CHRISTINA YANCEY, Plaintiff, v. LONDON BREED, et al., Defendants.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING FAILURE TO OPPOSE MOTION TO DISMISS RE: DKT. NO. 21
JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge.
This matter is set for a hearing on September 22, 2023, on the motion to dismiss filed by defendants London Breed, David Jung, Dian McHenry, Rocio Mendoza, Sari Mix, Dena Narbaitz, Hallie Albert, and Steven Tang (collectively “Defendants”). (Dkt. No. 21.) Pursuant to Local Civil Rule of the Northern District 7-3, plaintiff Estelle C. Yancey (“Plaintiff”)'s opposition or statement of non-opposition was due to be filed and served by no later than August 24, 2023. To date, the Court has not received any opposition or statement of non-opposition from Plaintiff.
Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE (“OSC”) in writing, by no later than July 21, 2023, why the pending motion to dismiss should not be granted in light of her failure to file a timely opposition or statement of non-opposition. If Plaintiff wishes to file a substantive response to the motion to dismiss, Plaintiff must demonstrate good cause for failing to file her opposition brief in a timely fashion. In her response to this OSC, Plaintiff is also directed to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff is admonished that her failure to respond to this Order by September 8, 2023, may result in dismissal of this action without further notice.
If Plaintiff files a substantive response to the pending motion to dismiss (and demonstrates good cause for her delay), the Court will allow Defendant to file a reply brief by no later than September 15, 2023. The hearing set for September 22, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. is HEREBY VACATED and may be reset by further order, if necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.