From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yan v. Lei (In re Yan)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Dec 12, 2011
No. C 11-2211 RS (N.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-2211 RS Bankruptcy No. 04-33526 TEC Adversary Proceeding No. 10-03149 TEC

12-12-2011

IN RE DEMAS WAI YAN, Debtor, DEMAS YAN Appellant and Defendant, v. CRYSTAL LEI., Appellee and Plaintiff.


ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Appellant Demas Yan purports to appeal from an order docketed in Adversary Proceeding No. 10-03149 TEC on February 23, 2011, denying his motion to dismiss the adversary complaint of Appellee Crystal Lei, and from an order docketed on April 22, 2011, denying his motion for reconsideration of the prior order. The denial of a motion to dismiss is an interlocutory order, and as such, is not appealable as of right, absent circumstances not present here. See Leisure Dev. Inc. v. Burke, 95 B.R. 716, 717 (9th Cir. BAP 1989) (citing John E. Burns Drilling Co. v. Central Bank of Denver, 739 F.2d 1489 (10th Cir. 1984)). While the Court has discretion to treat a notice of appeal as a motion for leave to appeal, see Leisure Dev., 95 B.R. at 717, nothing in the circumstances here warrants doing so. Accordingly, the appeal dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

RICHARD SEEBORG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Yan v. Lei (In re Yan)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Dec 12, 2011
No. C 11-2211 RS (N.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Yan v. Lei (In re Yan)

Case Details

Full title:IN RE DEMAS WAI YAN, Debtor, DEMAS YAN Appellant and Defendant, v. CRYSTAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Dec 12, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-2211 RS (N.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2011)