Opinion
2:23-cv-01142-APG-BNW
08-25-2023
BLAINE YAMAMOTO, an individual Plaintiff, v. HOMEOWNERS FINANCIAL GROUP USA, LLC an Arizona limited liability company; JULINE CHUTUK, an individual; BRIAN ESPOSITO, an individual; GEICO INSURANCE AGENCY, LLC, a foreign limited liability company; SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC, a foreign limited liability company; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation; FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION d/b/a FANNIE MAE, a corporation chartered by the U.S. Congress; DOES 1-10, inclusive; ROE ENTITIES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants.
BALLARD SPAHR LLP, Madeleine Coles, Joel E. Tasca Attorneys for Defendants Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. & Federal National Mortgage Association d/b/a Fannie Mae ARMAND LAW GROUP, Armand Fried Attorneys for Plaintiff PRHLAW LLC, Charles H. McCrea Attorneys for Defendant Homeowners Financial Group USA, LLC
BALLARD SPAHR LLP, Madeleine Coles, Joel E. Tasca Attorneys for Defendants Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. & Federal National Mortgage Association d/b/a Fannie Mae
ARMAND LAW GROUP, Armand Fried Attorneys for Plaintiff
PRHLAW LLC, Charles H. McCrea Attorneys for Defendant Homeowners Financial Group USA, LLC
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST)
The current deadline for Defendants Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Federal National Mortgage Association d/b/a Fannie Mae, Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, and Homeowners Financial Group USA, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) to respond to Plaintiff Blaine Yamamoto's (“Plaintiff”) Complaint is September 1, 2023. Counsel for Defendants and counsel for Plaintiff hereby stipulate and agree that Defendants shall have up to and including September 28, 2023, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.
This extension is necessary to allow the parties time to continue to work toward an early resolution of this case and to accommodate counsel for Plaintiff, who will be out of the country the third week of September.
This is the second request to this Court for such an extension, and it is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED: