Opinion
October 8, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.).
The expert's affidavit submitted by plaintiff in opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment in this medical malpractice action (see, CPLR 3101 [d] [1] [i]) was sufficient to raise triable issues of fact (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320; Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851).
Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Kassal, JJ.