From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Yaffe v. Mintz Fraade, P.C

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 7, 2000
270 A.D.2d 43 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

March 7, 2000

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered December 16, 1998, which granted the petition to consolidate petitioners' pending arbitration proceedings, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Ronald J. Litchman, for petitioners-respondents.

Alan P. Fraade, for respondent-appellant.

NARDELLI, J.P., WILLIAMS, ELLERIN, WALLACH, SAXE, JJ.


The court properly exercised its discretion in consolidating the arbitration proceedings, all of which involved claims that respondent failed to compensate petitioners in accordance with their "of counsel" contracts (see, County of Sullivan v. Edward L. Nezalak, Inc., 42 N.Y.2d 123, 128-129). Respondent's claim that it was substantially prejudiced in the arbitration proceeding by the consolidation order is not properly before the court.

Motion seeking leave to strike reply brief denied.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Yaffe v. Mintz Fraade, P.C

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 7, 2000
270 A.D.2d 43 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Yaffe v. Mintz Fraade, P.C

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT M. YAFFE, et al., Petitioners-Respondents, v. MINTZ FRAADE, P. C.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 7, 2000

Citations

270 A.D.2d 43 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
704 N.Y.S.2d 467

Citing Cases

In re of East Meadow School Dist

The Supreme Court, while denying this relief, ordered the two disputes to be the subject of a hearing before…

In Matter of Cohen v. S.A.C. Capital Advisors LLC

They stress that New York law authorizes this Court to consolidate the arbitration proceedings, see, Matter…