Egenera, Inc. v. Cisco Svs., Inc., 972 F.3d 1367, 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2020) (quoting Williamson, 792F.3datl348). Id; see also XR Commc'ns, LLC v. ARRIS Sols., Inc., 2023 WL 3529830, at *3 (Fed. Cir. May 18, 2023) (noting that § 112(f) is not avoided by "reciting something a POSITA would understand as structure ... if a POSITA wouldn't understand it as sufficient structure j£>7* performing the claimed function"'). C. "Controller"
"Structure disclosed in the specification qualifies as corresponding structure if the intrinsic evidence clearly links or associates that structure to the function recited by the claim." XR Commc'ns, LLC v. ARRIS Sols., Inc., Nos. 2022-1125, 2022-1141, 2023 WL 3529830, at *3 (Fed. Cir. May 18, 2023) (emphasis in original) (quoting Williamson, 792 F.3d at 1352).