From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Xiong v. Felker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 2, 2009
No. CIV S-08-1052 WBS EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-1052 WBS EFB P.

October 2, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). The court may appointment counsel at any stage of the proceedings "if the interests of justice so require." See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also, Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this stage of the proceedings.

Accordingly, it hereby is ORDERED that petitioner's September 28, 2009 request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Xiong v. Felker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 2, 2009
No. CIV S-08-1052 WBS EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2009)
Case details for

Xiong v. Felker

Case Details

Full title:XAI XIONG, Petitioner, v. T. FELKER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 2, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-08-1052 WBS EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2009)