From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Xiong v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 28, 2011
Case No.: 1:10-cv-01671 JLT (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:10-cv-01671 JLT.

October 28, 2011


ORDER GRANTING SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 17)


Parties have stipulated by counsel for Defendant to have an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 17). The Scheduling Order allows a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties. (Doc. 5 at 4). Notably, this thirty-day extension was granted on June 8, 2011, for the plaintiff to file an opening brief. (Doc. 13). Defendant's counsel asserts a second extension is necessary, "due to Defendant's counsel recent medical leave and absence from the office at the time of the previous deadline." (Doc. 17 at 1).

Good cause appearing, Defendant is granted a thirty-day extension, and shall file a responsive brief by November 21, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Xiong v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 28, 2011
Case No.: 1:10-cv-01671 JLT (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Xiong v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:YENG XIONG, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 28, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 1:10-cv-01671 JLT (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)