Opinion
2014-10-16
Lisa H. Blitman, New York for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Marta Ross of counsel), for respondent.
Lisa H. Blitman, New York for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Marta Ross of counsel), for respondent.
Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Adira Hulkower of counsel), attorney for the children.
MAZZARELLI, J.P., ACOSTA, DeGRASSE, MANZANET–DANIELS, JJ.
Order, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about December 13, 2010, which, following a fact-finding hearing, determined that respondent mother neglected the subject children, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
A preponderance of the evidence supports the finding that respondent neglected her three children by inflicting excessive corporal punishment on them ( seeFamily Court Act §§ 1012[f][i][B]; 1046[b][i]; Matter of Alex R. [Maria R.], 81 A.D.3d 463, 915 N.Y.S.2d 568 [1st Dept.2011] ). The children's independent, out-of-court statements to the caseworker, describing how respondent grabbed them by their clothing causing their clothing to rip, threw them on the bed, scratched them, punched them, and bit the oldest child on her back, cross-corroborated each other's statements ( see id.; Matter of Devante S., 51 A.D.3d 482, 857 N.Y.S.2d 141 [1st Dept.2008] ).
The children's out-of-court statements were further corroborated by the caseworker's own observation of a cut on the oldest child's lip and a bite mark on her back, as well as scratch marks on the middle child's hand, and an old belt mark on the youngest child's leg and photographs of the children's bruises ( see Matter of Harrhae Y. [Shy–Macca Ernestine B.], 112 A.D.3d 512, 512, 977 N.Y.S.2d 22 [1st Dept.2013] ), as well as respondent's own admission that she grabbed two of the children, ripped their clothing, hit her oldest child in the mouth and bit her on her back ( see Matter of Joshua J.P. [Deborah P.], 105 A.D.3d 552, 963 N.Y.S.2d 119 [1st Dept.2013] ).
There is no merit to respondent's argument that the finding of neglect is unsupported by the evidence because this was a “single” or isolated incident. The children told the caseworker about prior incidents. In any event, a single incident of excessive corporal punishment may be sufficient to sustain such a finding ( see Matter of Cevon W. [Talisha W.], 110 A.D.3d 542, 974 N.Y.S.2d 38 [1st Dept.2013] ).
We have considered respondent's remaining argument and find it unavailing.