From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ximenez v. Hartley

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 12, 2011
No. 2:08-cv-03056-JKS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:08-cv-03056-JKS.

October 12, 2011


ORDER [Re: Motion at Docket No. 51]


At Docket No. 51 Christopher James Ximenez filed an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. At Docket No. 10, this Court previously granted Ximenez leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees at Docket No. 51 is DENIED as moot.


Summaries of

Ximenez v. Hartley

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 12, 2011
No. 2:08-cv-03056-JKS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Ximenez v. Hartley

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER JAMES XIMENEZ, Petitioner, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden, Avenal…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 12, 2011

Citations

No. 2:08-cv-03056-JKS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011)