From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Xilinx v. Com. of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 13, 2010
592 F.3d 1017 (9th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

Nos. 06-74246, 06-74269.

January 13, 2010.

Tax Ct. Nos. 702-03, 4142-01, Northern District of California, San Francisco.

Tyler Alexander Baker, Esquire, Kenneth B. Clark, Esquire, Ronald B. Schrotenboer, Fenwick West LLP, Mountain View, CA, Edward C. Dumont, Seth P. Waxman, Wilmerhale LLP, Washington, DC, for Petitioner-Appellee.

John M. Breen, Esquire, Internal Revenue Service, Richard Farber, Esquire, Michael J. Haungs, Richard T. Morrison, Esquire, Eileen J. O'Connor, Esquire, Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Esquire DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Robert R. Di Trolio, Esquire, Clerk, U.S. Tax Court, Donald L. Korb, Esquire, Acting Chief Counsel, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellant.

Before: STEPHEN REINHARDT, JOHN T. NOONAN, and RAYMOND C. FISHER, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The opinion and dissent filed on May 27, 2009 are hereby WITHDRAWN.


Summaries of

Xilinx v. Com. of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 13, 2010
592 F.3d 1017 (9th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Xilinx v. Com. of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:XILINX, INC., and Consolidated Subsidiaries, Petitioner-Appellee, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 13, 2010

Citations

592 F.3d 1017 (9th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Altera Corp. v. Comm'r

The majority opinion by Judge Fisher reasoned that "[b]ecause the all costs requirement [of the 1995…

Altera Corp. v. Comm'r

Initially the panel, in a 2-1 decision, voted to reverse the Tax Court, which had unanimously struck the 1995…