Opinion
1130-23S
02-27-2023
ORDER
Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge
This case is before the Court on petitioner's Motion to Proceed Remotely, filed February 10, 2023. A review shows that petitioner's motion was incomplete in that there was no information provided in boxes 5 and 6 on the form. The Court will therefore deny petitioner's motion without prejudice, petitioner may refile a proper Motion to Proceed Remotely for the Court's consideration.
Upon due consideration, it is
ORDERED that petitioner's Motion to Proceed Remotely, filed February 10, 2023, is denied without prejudice.