From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

XEROX CORPORATION v. ACAR

United States District Court, S.D. California
Sep 27, 2005
Case No: 04CV 0592 WQH (WMc) (S.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2005)

Opinion

Case No: 04CV 0592 WQH (WMc).

September 27, 2005

ROSS A. SPECTOR, SPECTOR BENNETT, A Professional Corporation, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff, XEROX CORPORATION.


APPLICATION FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER [FRCP 41(a)(2)]


Defendant Bahadir Acar was a Chapter 7 debtor in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Southern District of California (Case No. 04-07632-JH7). Defendant Acar was granted a discharge on November 30, 2004. A copy of the defendant's Discharge is attached hereto.

As a result of the foregoing, plaintiff hereby applies to the court for a dismissal of this case with prejudice.

ORDER

The within litigation is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

It appearing that the debtor is entitled to a discharge, IT IS ORDERED: The debtor is granted a discharge under § 727 of title 11, United States Code, (the Bankruptcy Code).

EXPLANATION OF BANKRUPTCY DISCHARGE IN A CHAPTER 7 CASE

This court order grants a discharge to the person(s) named as the debtor(s). It is not a dismissal of the case and it does not determine how much money, if any, the trustee will pay to creditors.

Collection of Discharged Debts Prohibited

The discharge prohibits any attempt to collect from the debtor(s) a debt that has been discharged. For example, a creditor is not permitted to contact a debtor by mail, phone, or otherwise, to file or continue a lawsuit, to attach wages or other property, or to take any other action to collect a discharged debt from the debtor. [In a case involving community property:] [There are also special rules that protect certain community property owned by the debtor's spouse, even if that spouse did not file a bankruptcy case.] A creditor who violates this order can be required to pay damages and attorney's fees to the debtor(s).

However, a creditor may have the right to enforce a valid lien, such as a mortgage or security interest, against the debtor's property after the bankruptcy, if that lien was not avoided or eliminated in the bankruptcy case. Also, a debtor may voluntarily pay any debt that has been discharged.

Debts That are Discharged

The chapter 7 discharge order eliminates a debtor's legal obligation to pay a debt that is discharged. Most, but not all, types of debts are discharged if the debt existed on the date the bankruptcy case was filed. (If this case was begun under a different chapter of the Bankruptcy Code and converted to chapter 7, the discharge applies to debts owed when the bankruptcy case was converted.)

Debts that are Not Discharged

Some of the common types of debts which are not discharged in a chapter 7 bankruptcy case are:

a. Debts for most taxes;

b. Debts that are in the nature of alimony, maintenance, or support;

c. Debts for most student loans;

d. Debts for most fines, penalties, forfeitures, or criminal restitution obligations;
e. Debts for personal injuries or death caused by the debtor's operation of a motor vehicle while intoxicated;
f. Some debts which were not properly listed by the debtor;
g. Debts that the bankruptcy court specifically has decided or will decide in this bankruptcy case are not discharged;
h. Debts for which the debtor has given up the discharge protections by signing a reaffirmation agreement in compliance with the Bankruptcy Code requirements for reaffirmation of debts.
This information is only a general summary of the bankruptcy discharge. There are exceptions to these general rules. Because the law is complicated, you may want to consult an attorney to determine the exact effect of the discharge in this case.


Summaries of

XEROX CORPORATION v. ACAR

United States District Court, S.D. California
Sep 27, 2005
Case No: 04CV 0592 WQH (WMc) (S.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2005)
Case details for

XEROX CORPORATION v. ACAR

Case Details

Full title:XEROX CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. BAHADIR ACAR dba COPY HUT PLUS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. California

Date published: Sep 27, 2005

Citations

Case No: 04CV 0592 WQH (WMc) (S.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2005)