From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Xerox Corp. v. Arsh Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Nov 4, 2011
No. C11-04504 HRL (N.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2011)

Opinion

No. C11-04504 HRL

11-04-2011

XEROX CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ARSH INCORPORATED, Defendant.


NOT FOR CITATION


ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY

CLOSING CASE

Plaintiff advises that the parties have reached a settlement. Accordingly, all deadlines and scheduled appearances are vacated. Plaintiff further advises that it intends to voluntarily dismiss this action approximately two years from now, after the settlement is paid in full. The court sees no need to keep this matter on its docket of active litigation for that length of time. Accordingly, the clerk shall administratively close the file. However, if any party certifies to this court, with proof of service of a copy on the other party, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered or that the settlement has not been consummated as agreed, the foregoing order will be vacated, and this case will be reopened and restored on the court's calendar.

SO ORDERED.

HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

5:11-cv-04504-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:

Edward Soo Kim ekim@hemar-rousso.com

Pamela Lorraine Cox pcox@hemar-rousso.com

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.


Summaries of

Xerox Corp. v. Arsh Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Nov 4, 2011
No. C11-04504 HRL (N.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Xerox Corp. v. Arsh Inc.

Case Details

Full title:XEROX CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ARSH INCORPORATED, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 4, 2011

Citations

No. C11-04504 HRL (N.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2011)