From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Xerox Coroporation v. Printing Mailing Solutions, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 3, 2010
2:09-cv-00653-RLH-LRL (D. Nev. Sep. 3, 2010)

Opinion

2:09-cv-00653-RLH-LRL.

September 3, 2010


ORDER


For good cause shown,

IT IS ORDERED that Gordon Silver's Amended Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Defendants Quality Printing, Inc. and Leticia Castro (#94) is granted.

Defendants are advised that a corporation may appear in federal court only through licensed counsel. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 202 (1993). Default against a corporation, or dismissal of its claims, is a permissible sanction for its failure to comply with the requirement that it be represented by counsel. United States v. High Country Broadcasting Co., 3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th Cir. 1993).

IT IS THEREFORE FURTHER ORDERED that defendants shall have until October 8, 2010 to retain new counsel and file either a notice of appearance of new counsel or a memorandum explaining why they have not retained new counsel.

DATED this 3rd day of September, 2010.


Summaries of

Xerox Coroporation v. Printing Mailing Solutions, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 3, 2010
2:09-cv-00653-RLH-LRL (D. Nev. Sep. 3, 2010)
Case details for

Xerox Coroporation v. Printing Mailing Solutions, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:XEROX COROPORATION, Plaintiff, v. PRINTING AND MAILING SOLUTIONS, INC., et…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Sep 3, 2010

Citations

2:09-cv-00653-RLH-LRL (D. Nev. Sep. 3, 2010)