Xenes v. State

Full title: Carlos A. Nunez XENES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Sep 16, 2022

346 So. 3d 731 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 2D21-977

09-16-2022

Carlos A. Nunez XENES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Wayne R. Atkins and Matthew J. Troccoli of Xander Law Group, P.A., Miami, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Chelsea N. Simms, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa; and Allison C. Heim, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, (substituted as counsel of record), for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Wayne R. Atkins and Matthew J. Troccoli of Xander Law Group, P.A., Miami, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Chelsea N. Simms, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa; and Allison C. Heim, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, (substituted as counsel of record), for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See State v. Stahl , 206 So. 3d 124 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016). But see Garcia v. State , 302 So. 3d 1051 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020), review granted , SC20-1419, 2020 WL 7230441 (Fla. Dec. 8, 2020) (certifying conflict with Stahl , 206 So. 3d at 124, and certifying questions related to whether defendants can be compelled to orally disclose a smartphone passcode).

SILBERMAN, ATKINSON, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.