From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Xayamonty v. United States

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 24, 2022
2:22-cv-01175-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Aug. 24, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01175-GMN-EJY

08-24-2022

KHAMSAY XAYAMONTY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.


ORDER

ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

I. DISCUSSION

On August 3, 2022, Plaintiff filed an incomplete application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 3. On August 8, 2022, the Court issued an Order denying, without prejudice, Plaintiff's IFP request. ECF No. 4. The Order explained to Plaintiff that his application was missing a financial certificate and his inmate account statement for the previous six months. Id. The Order gave Plaintiff through September 8, 2022 to refile his application, and included instructions as well as the blank forms so that Plaintiff could proceed successfully. Id.

The account statement and financial certificate are required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and Local Rule LSR 12.

On August 22, 2022, Plaintiff filed his second IFP application. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff's second application to proceed IFP is again incomplete. The application is missing the same documents- the inmate account statement and a properly executed financial certificate-that were missing in Plaintiff's first filing. The Court advises Plaintiff that a financial certificate and an inmate account statement are not the same thing. See ECF No. 4-1 at 5-6.

II. ORDER

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's second application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 7) is DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court will send Plaintiff, for the second and last time, the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis by an inmate, as well as the document entitled information and instructions for filing an in forma pauperis application.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before September 26, 2022, Plaintiff must file a complete IFP application on this Court's approved form, which includes his inmate account statement for the past six months and a properly executed financial certificate, in compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Alternatively, Plaintiff may pay the $402 filing fee for a civil action on or before this date.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff fails to submit a complete IFP application including an inmate account statement for the past six months and a properly executed financial certificate, in compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), or pay the $402 filing fee for a civil action, the Court will recommend this case be dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

Xayamonty v. United States

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 24, 2022
2:22-cv-01175-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Aug. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Xayamonty v. United States

Case Details

Full title:KHAMSAY XAYAMONTY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 24, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01175-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Aug. 24, 2022)