From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wynne v. Wagner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 11, 2002
292 A.D.2d 447 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

00-09002

October 9, 2001

March 11, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated June 22, 2000, which granted the plaintiff's motion to dismiss his application, in effect, to vacate a judgment of the same court (Spodek, J.), entered March 19, 1998.

Ptashnik Schutzman, LLP (Mauro Goldberg Lilling, LLP, Great Neck, N.Y. [Kenneth Mauro, Christopher Simone, and Katherine Herr Solomon] of counsel), for appellant.

Viders Wiesen, Carle Place, N.Y. (Dominic J. Sichenzia of counsel), for respondent.

MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, LEO F. McGINITY, and DANIEL F. LUCIANO, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

This court previously reinstated the default judgment against the defendant, finding that it was the result of a pattern of willful neglect (see, Wynne v. Wagner, 262 A.D.2d 556). Thereafter, the defendant's motion to vacate the judgment and for a new hearing on damages was denied by order of the Supreme Court dated February 28, 2000. This appeal is from the defendant's subsequent motion, in effect, to vacate the judgment.

We reject the defendant's arguments that the damages awarded against him are not adequately supported by the evidence adduced at the inquest, and that the award is excessive.


Summaries of

Wynne v. Wagner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 11, 2002
292 A.D.2d 447 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Wynne v. Wagner

Case Details

Full title:CLINCEY WYNNE, RESPONDENT, v. LANCE WAGNER, APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 11, 2002

Citations

292 A.D.2d 447 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
738 N.Y.S.2d 865

Citing Cases

Chotan, Inc. v. Natan-Ya Enterprises Corp.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. The damages awarded against the appellant were adequately…