That decision is not complained of here and was not clearly erroneous. Davison v. State, 241 Ga. App. 685, 687 (3) ( 527 S.E.2d 285) (1999); Taylor v. State, 226 Ga. App. 339, 340 (1) ( 486 S.E.2d 601) (1997); Wynn v. State, 225 Ga. App. 206 (2) ( 483 S.E.2d 352) (1997). There was no harmful error.
Since Brown failed to object, he has waived this claimed error.Wynn v. State, 225 Ga. App. 206 ( 483 S.E.2d 352) (1997).Burruss v. State, 242 Ga. App. 241, 243 ( 529 S.E.2d 375) (2000) (Even when the state is required to give notice of its intent to admit prior convictions into evidence before sentencing, if the defendant failed to object, the issue is not preserved for review). 8.
Had this issue been properly preserved for appeal, we would have found that the statements at issue, made during the commission of the offenses, were admissible as res gestae. OCGA ยง 24-3-3; Wynn v. State, 225 Ga. App. 206 (3), 207 ( 483 S.E.2d 352) (1997); Basu v. State, 228 Ga. App. 591, 592-593 (1) ( 492 S.E.2d 329) (1997) (failure to raise issue at trial constitutes waiver). 2.