From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WYNN v. CATE

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 1, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0546 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0546 EFB P.

February 1, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff's consent. See E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4).

On October 19, 2010, the court dismissed claims against defendants Smith, Leatherman, Merritt, Cooper, Lackner, Palubicki, Grannis, Martel, Wilson, Thompson, Kaplan, Barroga, Cate, and Tilton with leave to amend within 30 days. Plaintiff has not filed amended claims against these defendants.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Smith, Leatherman, Merritt, Cooper, Lackner, Palubicki, Grannis, Martel, Wilson, Thompson, Kaplan, Barroga, Cate, and Tilton are dismissed from this action.

DATED: February 1, 2011.


Summaries of

WYNN v. CATE

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 1, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0546 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2011)
Case details for

WYNN v. CATE

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS PAUL WYNN, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 1, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0546 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2011)