Wynn Resorts Ltd v. Factory Mut. Ins. Co.

Full title: WYNN RESORTS, LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. FACTORY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 23, 2023

2:21-cv-01230-CDS-EJY (D. Nev. Aug. 23, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01230-CDS-EJY

08-23-2023

WYNN RESORTS, LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. FACTORY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

SNELL & WILMER LLP, Patrick G. Byrne, P.C., Bradley T. Austin, Esq. WEINBERG, WHEELER, HUDGINS, GUNN & DIAL, LLC, Ryan T. Gormley, Esq. JONES DAY, Tyrone R. Childress, Esq., Amanda P. Ellison, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), Jason B. Lissy, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Plaintiff Wynn Resorts, Limited ROBINS KAPLAN LLP Scott G. Johnson, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Defendant Factory Mutual Insurance Company

SNELL & WILMER LLP, Patrick G. Byrne, P.C., Bradley T. Austin, Esq.

WEINBERG, WHEELER, HUDGINS, GUNN & DIAL, LLC, Ryan T. Gormley, Esq.

JONES DAY, Tyrone R. Childress, Esq., Amanda P. Ellison, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice), Jason B. Lissy, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Plaintiff Wynn Resorts, Limited

ROBINS KAPLAN LLP Scott G. Johnson, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Attorneys for Defendant Factory Mutual Insurance Company

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO STAY CASE (FIRST REQUEST)

As indicated in ECF No. 61, Wynn Resorts, Limited (“Plaintiff”') filed its Motion to Stay Case and Enforcement of August 10^th and August 14^th Orders Pending Decision on Petition for Writ of Mandamus in the Nevada Supreme Court on August 17, 2023 (the “Motion”). As such, and pursuant to LR IA 6-1, 6-2, and LR 7-1, Plaintiff and Defendant Factory Mutual Insurance Company (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree, and respectfully request that the Court order, as follows:

1. That Defendant shall have up to and including September 6, 2023 to file its Response to the Motion;

2. That Plaintiff shall have up to and including September 15, 2023 to file its Reply in Support of its Motion; and

3. That good cause exists to enter the foregoing briefing schedule, as it will allow the Parties and their respective counsel sufficient time to analyze and respond to the issues raised via the Motion.

This stipulation is the Parties' first request for an extension of time concerning the briefing schedule on the Motion and is made in good faith and not intended to cause delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.