Opinion
No. 05-07-01003-CR
Opinion Filed September 9, 2008. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F06-68482-PJ.
Before Justices MOSELEY, RICHTER, and FRANCIS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Randy Wyatt waived a jury and pleaded guilty to possession with intent to deliver cocaine in an amount of four grams or more but less than 200 grams. The trial court assessed punishment, enhanced by two prior convictions, at twenty-five years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.