From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wyatt v. State

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 24, 2022
22-cv-00438-JSW (N.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-00438-JSW

02-24-2022

GEORGE WYATT, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF TEXAS, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSSAL

JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge.

On January 24, 2022, Plaintiff, a Texas prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a “notice” regarding the conditions of his confinement. The same day, the Clerk notified Plaintiff that he needed to file a form complaint, and also an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) or pay the filing fee, within 28 days. The Clerk also mailed to Plaintiff the Court's complaint and IFP forms, instructions for completing the forms, and a stamped return envelope. In the deficiency notices, Plaintiff was informed that the case would be dismissed if he did not file a complaint and either pay the filing fee or file a completed IFP before the deadline. No. response has been received from Plaintiff. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wyatt v. State

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 24, 2022
22-cv-00438-JSW (N.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Wyatt v. State

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE WYATT, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF TEXAS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 24, 2022

Citations

22-cv-00438-JSW (N.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2022)