From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wyatt v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Oct 28, 2011
No. 05-11-00083-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. 05-11-00083-CR

Opinion Filed October 28, 2011. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47.

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 401-82345-08.

Before Justices BRIDGES, RICHTER, and MURPHY.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Jacob Rholin Wyatt appeals from the adjudication of his guilt for the offense of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, a bottle. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.02(a)(2) (West 2011). The trial court assessed punishment at ten years' imprisonment. On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit and find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.


Summaries of

Wyatt v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Oct 28, 2011
No. 05-11-00083-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Wyatt v. State

Case Details

Full title:JACOB RHOLIN WYATT, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Oct 28, 2011

Citations

No. 05-11-00083-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 28, 2011)